Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself

2 posters

Go down

Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself Empty Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself

Post by Illuminated One Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:42 am

THIS EDITORIAL IS FROM ALLHIPHOP.COM CHECK THE SOURCE

SOURCE: http://allhiphop.com/stories/editorial/archive/2009/12/07/22056059.aspx

By Tolu Olorunda
Editor's note: The views expressed inside this editorial aren't necessarily the views of AllHipHop.com or its employees.

“Look: now, I ain't going for the okey-doke/

… This industry be trying to strangle Ni**as in the choke/”

—Rhymefest Ft. Kanye West, “More,” Blue Collar, 2006.

The tragedy of bullies, it seems, isn't so much in the exhibitionism, violent escapades, or raucous endeavors inevitably rendered, but in the refusal to admit the inescapable: impending downfall—imminent doom. And like all bullies—whether the larger-than-healthy kid on the playground, the parent who fails to recognize a child's humanity, the nation too fool of itself to curtail world domination—the music industry is lapping up its last left spoils, even as all indicators suggest this giant is crippled and wobbling—more importantly, from self-inflicted wounds.

Last wEek was one to remember. Very few thought it possible, but, as history shows, the most widely discarded possibilities almost always end up kicking dust in the eyes of naysayers.

On November 23, 2009, Scottish singer Susan Boyle, of fame Britain's Got Talent (season 3), released her debut album, I Dreamed a Dream. Three months prior to the set date, it had already become an Amazon best-seller. And, sure enough, when the U.S. Billboard sales results were revealed last week Wednesday, most were stunned, as the classically trained singer sold 701,000 copies in the U.S. alone. Other reports crowned her not only the fastest selling UK debut album in history, and the strongest for a female artist ever (since Soundscan), but, perhaps most meaningfully, the biggest opening weeks sales thus far in 2009.

I Dreamed a Dream was in such hotcakes-like demand that it smashed into bits and pieces the next four albums in line combined—three of whom, by industry standards, would be considered commercial collections. Not even American Idol runner-up Adam Lambert, with his recent American Music Awards publicity stunt, came close (198,000); neither did Rihanna, with her highly-publicized media blitzkrieg campaign (181,000); nor did the clichéd Lady Gaga, with her many shock and awe-aimed antics (174,000). The only other redeeming moment, beside Boyle’s triumph, seemed to be classical tenor vocalist Andrea Bocelli’s 2nd place steal with 218,000 copies of his latest album, My Christmas.

So, what does all this say about the future of an industry too preoccupied with commercial, replaceable, disposable artists—and the music they make? A good deal. For starters, that the age of gimmickry might be nearing its coffin hole.

When Susan Boyle shot up to international acclaim 8 months ago, following an audition for the British reality show Britain's Got Talent, it occurred to some that this budding superstar’s success might just be the wakeup call needed to jolter an industry hung over from self-supplied inebriation. Hip-Hop producer Pharrell was one of them.

Speaking with Rest In Beats shortly after the finale of Britain's Got Talent, Pharrell called on record labels to return to the antiquated model of artistry over attractiveness and skill over sensuality. It was Boyle’s musicianship, not top model-like qualities, that “engaged everybody,” he said. And while many—in the millions—preferred to mock her for whatever physical deformities they could convince themselves she possessed, he saw things much differently: “She is talented, and someone should be signing her right now—because it would work. The world would want to hear that.” He went on to attack the “aesthetic”-fetish music companies have entertained for the last 20 years, and argued that it was time to return to the days when fans were treated with more dignity and respect than is currently the case: “What music was—and is going back to—is, how talented is this person? And Susan Boyle is exactly my point. … Sleephe was captivating. … And that, to me, is star quality.”

Well, who'da thunk it?

Obviously Simon Cowell (Syco) and Columbia Records were much too smart to pass up the opportunity, but who says Susan Boyle would have ever had a chance if she never swept up so many millions of fans on YouTube, or wowed the audiences at home who put her in week after week—until the last? Who says this precious jewel wouldn’t have been laughed at hysterically—if not directly insulted—by A&Rs and higher-up executives at the biggest and boldest of record labels if she had asked for an opportunity to prove her worth at some indoor audition? And who says even after this shake-up—which I’m sure will have far-reaching effects into the new year—the same suits responsible for the graphic decline in music sales the last 10 years would actually take into account the lesson Boyle is teaching them, rather than engage in the same blame-the-consumer tactics most have turned into a sport?

It’s worth noting that only 6% of Boyle’s sales were internet-based, with iTunes accounting for a mere 40,000 downloads in total sales. The lesson can’t be overlooked: Fans are still interested in the physical nature of music—but simply prefer actual MUSIC, not machine-made mockery of everything music should stand for. The implications are obvious: In the last 10 years, album sales have declined 45%, while digital downloads have bubbled. From 2007 to 2008, over a billion songs were downloaded, accounting for a 27% increase. In contrast, only 361 million CDs were sold in ‘08, down nearly 20 percent from ‘07. In the last three years alone, CD sales have dropped from 90% to 84% to 77% of market revenue.

In The Long Tail (2006), Wired editor-in-chief Chris Anderson spoke more eloquently to this trend: “Sales fell 2.5 percent in 2001, 6.8 percent in 2002, and just kept dropping. By the end of 2005 (down another 7 percent), music sales in the United States had dwindled more than a quarter from their peak. … Between 2001 and 2005, the music industry’s total sales fell by a quarter. But the number of hit albums fell by nearly half.” [Anderson, Chris. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. New York: Hyperion, 2006, p. 32.]

As assumable, the repercussions have been grave for the big four—Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, EMI, and Sony BMG—which in 2006 scrapped up net sales of $11.5 billion, compared to more uplifting, less dreary, times like 1996: $14.5 billion.

Rather than engage the larger fan-base like normal human beings would, or submit to national listening tours to find out firsthand the causes that provoked such immitigable effects, record companies have sought out three options: 1) Litigate against “illegal downloaders” (even if, as a recent study suggests, they happen to buy the most music. 2) Bind artists to 360 deals. 3) Pursue, unscrupulously and unwisely, avenues which once functioned as unofficial, but sanctioned, bellboys for labels.

In the last decade, since the advent of Napster (the “N-word”), labels have been unleashing high-priced attorneys on middle-school students, high-school students, and college students—most of whom know no better—to retrieve some kind of payback for the billions lost these last few years. Those charged with illegal music downloading or file sharing on Peer-to-Peer sites have been sued as high as $675,000 and $2,000,000. Per song, defendants can be charged up to $750 - $150,000. Of course the cowardice of the industry hasn’t had much effect on students, as a recent University of Reading study found 75% of the 10,000 students polled prefer downloading music to buying hard copies or even streaming. These crackdowns on teenagers, which many believe to be useful or legal or responsible, is akin to the bully who, once knocked down by a bigger bully, searches fervently for the smallest kid around to redeem his/her pride through.

Labels have also unfurled another trick up their sleeves—make mandatory the 360 deal (“multiple rights”) for any new artist signed. The 360 is essentially the musical contractual clause equivalent of the Patriot Act. “It effectively robs the artist of any and every opportunity to make money independently—without the major labels’ claws deep into his/her pockets. What it says, with no attempt at equivocation, is, You work for us. Your blood, sweat, and tears are ours. We own you. Now, pay us!” It ensures labels profit from every venture an artist—no matter how slick or savvy—is involved in. The 360 is a perfect avenue through which labels are able to reclaim their “pride” by reminding artists not only of who’s boss but who’s king.

And if brow-beating teenage music lovers—who’ve been forced upon (against their wills) disposable, downloadable music for years—wasn’t enough, and gagging artists didn’t cut the check, labels are increasingly getting tough on mixtape DJs, club owners, and even dance non-for-profit organizations who play music without—*wink-wink*—their consent.

On January 16, 2007 the Atlanta-based DJ Drama and DJ Cannon, along with 17 others, were arrested on racketeering charges and accused of selling mixtapes illegally. In the stunning raid of offices where both produced their well-received mixtape series, SWAT teams seized over 50,000 CDs, computers, recording equipments, cold-hard cash, bank statements, and vehicles. The Hip-Hop community was, understandably, shaken up. For years, mixtapes were considered a vital part of—if not inextricable link to—the artist development process (which, as we all know, is a thing of the past). A&Rs understood how important a Hip-Hop artist had to nurture a street fan base that could help multiply demand with word-of-mouth. And the easiest, if not cheapest, ways about this was through mixtapes. Most DJs made no money off the mixtapes, but ended up with label contracts, exclusive releases, or production gigs for their hard work. Recently, however, labels have become much too weary with DJs, whom they accuse of making fortunes off the backs of their artists, and stealing the thunders from executives who do the real work of marketing and promotion. This convenient amnesia, fused with self-delusion, would only be laughable if it weren’t so serious. It gets worse. This misinformation campaign is successfully dividing artists and DJs—installing chips on the shoulders of artists who once could never establish a career without successful mixtape DJs willing to take chances on them. Lil’ Wayne’s misguided, expletive-riddled rants against mixtape DJs a year and half ago is a sobering example.

But even this apparently doesn’t quite fit the bill. Increasingly, industry executives, and their high profile artists, like Jay-Z, are suing bars for playing music without permission. The labels, it has been reported, send “spies”—operatives!—to bars to check out what songs are being played, and report back to headquarters. It gets even worse.

The Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN)—which, unlike an organization concerned with the affairs of its members, is actually driving a wedge between artists and concert promoters, between artists and bloggers—has begun demanding that non-for-profit dance studios or gymnastic clubs pay “tariffs” for any songs played in practice sessions, no matter how small the audience participating. And, under its “Fitness Activities and Dance Instruction” category, such organizations must pony up the “average number of persons per week per room multiplied by $2.14.”

When an 11-year-old girl is being bullied by big industry hitmen you know something is wrong. But the tragedy of bullies, it seems, isn't so much in the exhibitionism, violent escapades, or raucous endeavors inevitably rendered; rather, in the refusal to admit the inescapable: impending downfall—imminent doom.

Tolu Olorunda is a cultural critic whose work regularly appears on TheDailyVoice.com and other online journals. He can be reached at: Tolu.Olorunda@gmail.com.
Illuminated One
Illuminated One
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 4519
Age : 39
Location : Detroit

http://southernstylebeatz.com

Back to top Go down

Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself Empty Re: Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself

Post by Illuminated One Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:42 am

THAT IS SOME REAL SHIT
Illuminated One
Illuminated One
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 4519
Age : 39
Location : Detroit

http://southernstylebeatz.com

Back to top Go down

Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself Empty Re: Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself

Post by Johnnie Butters Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:52 pm

man thats a long as read lol
Johnnie Butters
Johnnie Butters
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 11135
Age : 35
Location : Miami, FL

http://Satisfyer.com

Back to top Go down

Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself Empty Re: Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself

Post by Illuminated One Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:53 pm

if u read it though... lol its a good read... Susan Boyle outsold everyone and they momma! lol

with only a small fraction of sales coming digital...

meaning 90% or more were actual physical CD sales...

lol its a trip
Illuminated One
Illuminated One
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 4519
Age : 39
Location : Detroit

http://southernstylebeatz.com

Back to top Go down

Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself Empty Re: Why the Music Industry Can’t Save Itself

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum