SONY Locks In Sam Raimi & Tobey Maguire In 'Spider-Man 4'; Studio May Shoot '4' & '5' Together!!!!!!!
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
SONY Locks In Sam Raimi & Tobey Maguire In 'Spider-Man 4'; Studio May Shoot '4' & '5' Together!!!!!!!
by J The Kidd Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:18 pm
It's time to end once and for all the rampant speculation. Sony
doesn't want any info to leak but I'm told that both star Tobey Maguire
and director Sam Raimi will be returning to make Zodiac screenwriter
Jamie Vanderbilt's script of Spider-Man 4. Sources tell me that Sony
has recently locked in both veterans of Spider-Man 1 through 3. And I
do mean recently because just a few weeks ago sources told me that Sony
Pictures co-chairman Amy Pascal was openly discussing Tobey's potential
replacements with various Hollywood agents because Tobey was hanging
tough about a deal. "She was looking around to cover herself because
Sony wanted him badly and Tobey wasn't sure he wanted to do it," an
insider explained to me. There's no deal yet for Kirsten Dunst but Mary
Jane Watson will be in the movie again. I'm told Sony "would never
recast her" despite her rehab problems. But expect another gal part,
too.
Sony would never recast Kirsten Dunst? Why? Was she that awesome in the
role? I don't think so. There are a ton of actresses who coud play the
part. Besides, Mary Jane in the comic books was more...what's the word
I'm looking for...womanly to me. Is womanly a word? If it isn't, then
it is now.
The article continues on about the spinoff Venom movie that I believe
can only be awesome as fuck or suck major donkey balls. I don't think
there will be any middle ground on this one:
And Sony has hired a pair of screenwriters to get going on the
Spider-Man spinoff movie Venom. Given that comic book artist/writer and
action figure maker, Todd McFarlane, who is one of the creators of the
Marvel villain, doesn't think a Venom movie could do well with a
villain as the central character, my sources think Sony should let
Topher Grace, even though he was blown up at the end of Spider-Man 3
(yet a portion of the Venom costume survived), stay in the role because
the likeable actor could be a a sympathetic evildoer.
Click HERE to read the entire article.
This whole Spider-Man thing really makes me angry. Here's what I would have done:
They had an awesome opportunity to do a back to back Spider-Man 3 and 4
with Venom in the 3rd movie as the sole villain and a carry over
Carnage story for the 4th. Sure, you could do some small thing with
Harry Osborn in the 3rd, but the main plot would have been the creation
of Venom and how he hates Parker/Spider-Man. In the middle of the movie
is an enormous fight where Venom kicks the shit out of Spider-Man,
leaving him almost dead, but telling him he's not going to kill him.
He's going to make him suffer first by going after the ones he loves.
This creates a big battle at the end with Harry helping Peter defeat
and kill Venom. (Just my basic story outline)
This cover right here helps to explain what I'm talking about.
Imagine the end of the 3rd movie. Carnage comes into play after Venom
is defeated with a 'To Be Continued' seconds after. Supporters would
have shit in their pants. Then part 4 is Spider-Man really fighting for
his life when this psycho, Cletus Kasady, gets loose on the streets
with Venom's offspring.
They could have even had Venom live for a huge Venom/Carnage fight.
Make Spider-Man and Venom become unwilling allies (Harry is still dead)
to take down Carnage because he's become a threat to both of them. THAT
could have led to a Venom spin-off movie.
But noooooo, nobody in Hollywood wants to think ahead. So for
Spider--Man 3 we got stuck with 10 minutes of Venom and Peter Parker
dancing on tables in a jazz club. Awesome.
What do you guys think should be the story for 4 and 5? Should it be
one big story or separate stories? And what villains would they use?
Kraven? Hobgoblin? Rhino? Shocker?
Comment away people. Maybe we can make some noise so they can get it right this time.
J The Kidd- Admin
- Number of posts : 12671
Location : Nevada -
Re: SONY Locks In Sam Raimi & Tobey Maguire In 'Spider-Man 4'; Studio May Shoot '4' & '5' Together!!!!!!!
by Wreckless Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:52 pm
lol i love spiderman, LOL @ this part
Sony would never recast Kirsten Dunst? Why? Was she that awesome in the
role? I don't think so. There are a ton of actresses who coud play the
part. Besides, Mary Jane in the comic books was more...what's the word
I'm looking for...womanly to me. Is womanly a word? If it isn't, then
it is now.
LMAO..kirsten dunst i think fits the role well
Sony would never recast Kirsten Dunst? Why? Was she that awesome in the
role? I don't think so. There are a ton of actresses who coud play the
part. Besides, Mary Jane in the comic books was more...what's the word
I'm looking for...womanly to me. Is womanly a word? If it isn't, then
it is now.
LMAO..kirsten dunst i think fits the role well
Wreckless- I Have Been Permanently Banned
- Number of posts : 823
Age : 36
Location : Homoville
Similar topics» Tobey "Spider-Man" Maguire Hates The Paparazzi's!!!!!!!
» Studio Owner Goes After Pras For Unpaid Studio Fees
» Unhappy Worker Locks Down San Francisco's Wireless Network!!!!!!
» NEW Ferrari F430 Scuderia Spider 16M!!!!!!!
» Sony Debuts Touchscreen Reader... The PRS-700!!!!!!!
» Studio Owner Goes After Pras For Unpaid Studio Fees
» Unhappy Worker Locks Down San Francisco's Wireless Network!!!!!!
» NEW Ferrari F430 Scuderia Spider 16M!!!!!!!
» Sony Debuts Touchscreen Reader... The PRS-700!!!!!!!
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum